TITLE:

 

Testing of Precision Agriculture Technologies in Irrigated Cotton at AG-CARES, Lamesa, Texas, 2001.

 

AUTHORS:

 

              K.F. Bronson, J.W. Keeling, T. Wheeler, R.J. Lascano, R. K. Boman, E. Segarra, J.

Booker, J.D. Booker, J. Mabry, Assistant Professor, Professor, Associate Professor,

Professor, Extension Specialist, Professor, Research Associates and Technician.

 

METHODS AND PROCEDURES:

 

              Experimental Design:    Randomized complete block with 3 replications

              Plot size:                     53 ft wide (16, 40-inch rows) and > 500 ft long.

              Experimental area:          27 ac

              Soil type:                          Amarillo sandy loam to sandy clay loam

              Variety:                             Paymaster Roundup® Ready 2326

              Soil sampling:                  Half-ac grid (Fig.1 and 2)

              P fertilizer rate:                Blanket-rate of 30 lb P2O5/ac,

                                                         Average Variable-rate of 16 lb P2O5/ac

                                                         Zero-P

Planting date:                  May

              Harvest date:                   October

              Irrigation:                         LEPA on a 3.5 day schedule at 75% estimated cotton ET

replacement

 

 

 

SUMMARY

SUBSTANTIALLY LESS P FERTILIZER WAS APPLIED TO THE VARIABLE-RATE PLOTS (AVERAGE OF 16 LB P2O5/AC) THAN IN THE BLANKET-RATE PLOTS (30 LB P2O5/AC). HOWEVER, LANDSCAPE POSITION/SLOPE AT LAMESA, HAD GREATER IMPACT ON COTTON P ACCUMULATION AND YIELDS THAN P MANAGEMENT.


 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Cotton [Gossypium hirsutum (L.)] response to P fertilizer is often inconsistent. Variable-rate fertilization can match soil test P and P fertilizer rate on a site-specific basis. Soil properties and landscape positions may affect P fertilizer response and yields. Our main objective was to compare variable-rate P, blanket-rate P, and zero-P applications on a 27-ac site at AG-CARES, Lamesa, TX. Soil samples (0-6 in.) were taken in the spring of 2001 on a 0.5 ac grid, and analyzed for Mehlich-3-P. Phosphorus uptake at early squaring (Fig. 1) and lint yields (Fig. 2) were greater in the bottomslope than in the south-facing sideslope. In 2001, lint yields responded to blanket-rate P in the south-facing sideslope only.




Table 1. Lint yield as affected by phosphorus fertilization and landscape position, AG-CARES, Lamesa, TX, 2001.


Phosphorus treatment

North-facing sideslope

Bottomslope

South-facing sideslope

S.E. of the difference

Mean

 

----------------------------------------------- lb/ac-------------------------------------------

Variable rate-P

892 a†

1047 a

866 ab

50

935 a†

Blanket rate-P

963 a

1013 a

885 a

50

953 a

Zero-P

896 a

1021 a

769 b

50

896 a

S.E. of difference

46

51

90

 

29

Mean

916 b‡

1026 a

840 b

29

 

† Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different by pairwise t test (P=0.05)

‡ Means in a row followed by the same letter are not significantly different by pairwise t test (P=0.05)

 

agcaresrptpuptlbs.jpg

Fig. 1. Phosphorus uptake at early squaring and grid soil/plant sampling locations, AG-CARES, Lamesa, TX 2001

agcaresrptlintlbs.jpg

Fig. 2. Lint yields (interpolated between hand sampling points), (V = VRT,

B=blanket-rate, Z=xero-P), AG-CARES, Lamesa, TX 2001